This section should analyze the issue presented and explain your view of it. There is no "right" answer. Instead, you should consider various aspects, as you develop your own position on the issue.For analysis on a section, you should analyze the issue presented and explain your views on the matter. There is no right answer. Instead, you should consider various perspectives. Use relevant reasons or examples from their experiences, your observations, or reading to develop your own position on the issue.
What is Measured
The analysis of a problem tests your ability to explore the complex issue or opinion and possibly take a position that is informed by your understanding.
"People often complain that products are built to last. We believe that the products wear out fairly quickly wastes both natural and human resources. What we see, however, is that such manufacturing practices keep costs down for consumers and stimulate demand. "
What do you find most persuasive appeal of the products do not last or the response to this? Explain your position using relevant reasons and / or examples from your experience, your observations, or reading.What do you find most persuasive appeal of the products do not last or the response to this? Explain your position using relevant reasons and / or examples from your experience, your observations, or reading.
The following example of the paper will receive the highest rating:
Many people believe that the products are not built to last, and similarly, many natural and human resources wasted. On the other hand, noted that such manufacturing practices keep costs and thus stimulate demand. In this lecture, we favor the former statement and refuting the latter statement.
Products are not designed to keep wasting much of the natural and human resources. The exact amount of waste of natural resources depends on the particular product. For example, in the automotive industry in Yugoslavia is a classic example of low-priced vehicle that was not the last. Since the average Yugo had (not "have" because there is no longer!) A life expectancy of two years and 25,000 miles, was a terrible waste.
The automotive industry standards today WARRANTY create vehicles for about five years and 50,000 miles. By making cheap Yugo that last half as long as most cars are GUARANTEED Yugoslavia producer is wasting precious natural resources. These resources could be used by Ford or Toyota to produce Escort or Tercel that will last twice as long, reducing the use of natural resources by a factor two.
Human resources in this example is waste. On the production side, manufacturers of a poor car quality, such as Yugoslavia, have no personal or professional satisfaction from the fact that their product is the worst car in the U.S.. This knowledge adverse effects on the productivity of workers in Yugoslavia.
In contrast, workers at the Saturn plant constantly receives positive feedback for successful products. Saturn is proud of its reputation for quality and innovation that can be seen in the recent massive recall to fix a defect. This withdrawal is done so well that the image of Saturn was actually enhanced. Had a recall took place in a factory Yugo, the poor would be even worse.
Another factor in human resources is the reaction of consumers. A large proportion of human resources have been wasted by Yugo owners await the dreaded crane to appear to pull away Yugo carcass. Any vehicle owner who is unsure of his / her vehicle efficiency of 7 in the morning, as he / she can go to work, sees a great despair. This is a huge waste of human resources for the consumer.
While conscious consumer waste of natural and human resources in a poor quality, so does the manufacturer. People who argue that low quality manufacturing processes maintain low costs for consumers and thus stimulate demand should look at the example of Yugoslavia. In mid-1980, Yugoslavia was by far the cheapest car in the U.S. to $ 3,995. In 1991, Yugoslavia was no longer sold here and became synonymous with the word "lemon".